- Anthony Kila:Air Peace to London is not just a flight
- Walk For Love Africa (WFLA) Set to Hold Inaugural Summit
- Airlines unblock lower ticket inventories as fares on int’l’ routes set to crash
- Green Africa Launches Second Annual Zero Naira Fare Campaign
- Qatar Airways, Gategroup Ink In-flight Catering Pact
The Receiver/Manager of Arik Air Limited (in Receivership) (Arik) and the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) have reacted to a judgment of the Federal High Court, Lagos delivered on Friday, March 31, 2023.
The Federal High Court, Lagos on Friday made a declaration and ruled that the attempt to transfer Arik Air Limited Assets to NG Eagle Airlines (third defendant); an airline that the Assets Management Corporation of Nigeria tried to transmute Arik to, and Super Bravo Limited is not in the best interest of Arik Air as a whole.
In a certified true copy paper obtained by Aviation Metric, dated March 31, 2023, it noted that Kamilu Alaba Omokhide (First defendant), Reciever Manager of Arik Air failed to act in accordance with section 553 of the Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020.
But the management of the airline in a statement Sunday night stated that the Judgement clearly and without equivocation affirmed that AMCON was competent and empowered to appoint the Receiver/Manager of Arik.
It stated that the appointment by AMCON was proper and that the continued operations of Arik are not affected. Put simply: the judgment does not affect the operations of Arik or the powers of the Receiver/Manager to superintend the affairs of Arik.
“Specifically, the Judgment did not either: (i) rule against the appointment of the Receiver/Manager of Arik or (ii) “grant all the prayers of the Plaintiffs” as stated in certain online publications. The Court did hold that the Receiver/Manager was obligated to act in the best interests of Arik and other creditors – a point that AMCON and the Receiver/Manager have never disputed”.
However, AMCON and the Receiver/Manager expressed dissatisfaction with certain parts of the judgment relating to AMCON’s dealings in specific transactions concerning limited assets.
“We are exercising our constitutional rights to appeal, in respect of these. The public should bear in mind that the issues under appeal have no bearing on the continued operation of Arik as a company in Receivership – as the Court has already affirmed the Receivership”.
“We urge media houses and the general public to rely only on certified true copies of court judgments, especially in reportage about court pronouncements”.