- Tropicana Scuba Diving: Akinboboye’s 8th Tourism Product
- NCAA lifts United Nigeria’s plane suspension, carrier begs passengers
- Olateru: Nigeria must undergo reforms for rapid development
- Ethiopian Airlines bars use of popular Ghana Must Go sack over damage to conveyor belts
- At Sabre tech expo, Keyamo, Olowo, others highlight investment in technology to drive travel growth
The global commercial aircraft market is dominated by two manufacturers, European conglomerate, Airbus, and Seattlebased aerospace giant, Boeing. WOLE SHADARE writes that their innovations amid stiff rivalry is helping to reshape the travel industry
Race for market share
Their drive to secure market share is affecting everything from which aircraft you are on, to what routes you can choose from and how many passengers you share the cabin with.
The rivalry between the two is shaping not just their own future but the air travel industry itself, driving innovative aircraft design, new buying patterns among airlines and expanded route maps that offer travelers more choices, flexibility and convenience. The rivalry began when Airbus was founded to consolidate the fragmented European aerospace sector in 1969.
They have been slowly growing their market share ever since, while Boeing bought out and or outcompeted other U.S. firms, leaving the two as the only major commercial aircraft manufacturers. As the worldwide travel market expanded from just over 400, 000 travellers in 1973 to 3.96 billion in 2016, Airbus and Boeing fought to gain market share in the rapidly growing industry, competing at every level over who would get the largest slice of the rapidly-growing pie.
Today, both companies are using every advantage they can find, driving innovation and efficiency.
Boeing and Airbus each control around half of the global aircraft market, and analysts anticipate the booming travel industry needing as many as 39, 000 new planes over the next 20 years. With a value of over $6 trillion over two decades, even small differences in market share add up to big business; so, it is no wonder competition is so fierce.
One of the main ways Airbus has clawed valuable ground away from Boeing has been the success of mid-range models like the A340 and A320Neo, the latter of which currently enjoys a 59% market share in its class.
This leads us to the first way the rivalry of these two firms and the new aircraft technologies they are developing is reshaping the air travel industry. That is, the changing shape of airline fleet themselves and the tyres of planes you are likely to fly on. On the early years of the new millennium, many airlines as well as Airbus thought the key to lower costs in the future would be sizes.
Boeing’s 747 was the queen of the skies, oil was cheap and passenger numbers were steadily increasing.
Larger airplanes would allow carriers to get the most out of their precious take-off and landing slots at crowded international hubs and the more passengers they could fit into each plane, the more profitable they would be. This was the theory behind Airbus’ huge, double-decker A380 superjumbo, designed to shuttle travelers between global hubs in large numbers. “We’ ll sell lot more than 250.
We’ ll sell 700 or 750 Airbus’ Noel Forgeard opined back in 2005. Sixteen years on, only 225 A380 aircraft are in service and it took a last ditch deal with Emirates to stave the shutdown of the programme. So, what happened?
New aircraft buying patterns Airlines changed their buying patterns, favoring a mix of greater emphasis on the narrow-body and smaller wide-body section of the market at the expense of the superjumbo.
Boeing banked on a contrasting model of the future, anticipating higher frequencies on major hub-to-hub trunk routes along with a proliferation of services linking smaller cities to the network.
Rising fuel costs and the pressure of the global financial crisis on airline balance sheets pushed the industry in the direction Boeing had predicted. Now, smaller narrow-body aircraft make up the vast bulk of all those sold, currently accounting for more than 75 per cent of total sales.
But the way aircraft were deployed was also a big part of the change. Smaller aircraft redeployed more easily to meet demand, are easier to fill with customers and have lower running costs, making them attractive propositions for carriers. That doesn’t mean that the Superjumbo is a thing of the past.
“Given a purely commercial choice, most airlines would order mid-size, long-range aircraft to replenish their fleet” says David Richardson, Vice President of Air Strategy for FCTG Americas. He added: “However, ordering new aircraft has a political dimension, particularly for state owned carriers. I would expect a continued trend of reduced but continued Super-jumbo orders.” But airline preferences alone don’t tell the whole story.
The desires of customers also played a crucial role. Airlines realized that consumers, especially First and Business-class passengers on their prized intercontinental routes, wanted frequent rather than large services. Basically, business travelers were much more interested in how soon the next service was than in how many people it was carrying. So, fleets of super-jumbo jets increasingly gave way to more adaptable inventories of narrowbody craft flying more frequently.
This trend seems set to continue as competition and excess capacity keeps ticket prices low.
But, this transition of buying patterns didn’t happen in a vacuum. Airlines took advantage of other, more suitable models being offered by Airbus and Boeing as they competed to offer the most compelling value proposition to their customers. In that sense, the super-jumbos are victims of their own manufacturers’ success with other models, as well as changing demands of consumers. But what were the innovations that enabled this shift?
These more efficient and longer- ranged, small to mid-sized aircraft have enabled airlines to expand route maps, add new services between previously unconnected city pairings and give travelers more choice.
These new services, known as ‘long and thin’ routes, connect smaller airports with more distant hubs, or even link two ‘spoke’ cities together. Rather than having to fly to a larger hug like New York and then getting a long-haul flight, more and more consumers can fly direct. Boston is an excellent example of how new aircraft technology is unlocking opportunities for airlines and travelers. What was previously thought of as a minor long-haul destination has had more than 12 new routes added to its roster over the last few years.
Services from Boston now go to Tokyo, Shanghai, Beijing, London, Oslo and more all without stopping at an intermediate hub. This is particularly useful to business travelers, saving them the time and hassle of transiting in congested hub airports and providing direct routes to their destinations.
And this story is being repeated at other airports around the country. San Diego, Austin, San Jose, St Louis, Portland, Baltimore, Hartford, Orlando and others are all being linked to hubs farther afield directly. Year 2017 saw more than 53 such services linking previously unconnected city pairings using the Boeing’s flagship 787 Dreamliner alone. This trend will only accelerate as more new aircraft roll off the production lines and airlines continue to find new ways to profitably employ them to serve the market.
This productive rivalry has a long way to go yet. Both Boeing and Airbus are plowing billons into research and developments to try to gain an edge, pioneering new forms of air transportation and propulsion in the process. Airbus’ E-Fan all-electric prototype aircraft completed a demonstration flight over the English Channel in 2015.
Not to be outdone, Boeing invested in electric aircraft startup Zunum which plans to launch a hybrid-electric commercial air service by 2022. Airbus has also been issued a patent for a new supersonic jet in the mode of the now defunct Concorde, which would be be able to fly from London to New York in just over an hour by moving at 4.5 times the speed of sound.
They have already helped give travelers more frequent services, more destinations and more flexibility determining routes, all while lowering costs and reducing noise pollution. Nobody knows what the two aircraft giants have in their sleeves next.
While it might be years before any of these projects comes to fruition, if they prove viable at all, these aerospace giants and the ongoing rivalry between them will be changing the nature of air travel for airlines and consumers for years to come.Google+